eNews & Background Info by TraceConsult™

Subscribe to these eNews free of charge by clicking here and providing some basic contact details.

The following eNews items are selected from international media and, in almost all cases, preceded by our Comments. Links to the original source are provided.



Germany's # 1 retailer EDEKA introduces "GMO-free" milk while Rewe and tegut expand their offer also to NRW

E-mail Print PDF

Comment by TraceConsult™: Germany’s # 1 retailer, EDEKA, has just announced it is joining the ranks of those stores that have begun months ago to do just that – offer their customers the opportunity to select milk and other dairy products stemming from cows reared without any biotech feed ingredients.  

Read EDEKA’s media statement (in German) or simply the article below and compare this to our coverage of a move undertaken by Rewe and tegut … dating back to last January when those two supermarket chains announced the conversion to “Ohne GenTechnik” labeled milk in their southern regions. At the end of this month (see our second coverage further below), the two chains will copy their own earlier move in Germany’s most populous state, NRW. The program now launched by EDEKA is in the northern region, significantly narrowing the gaps on the German map where consumers still have no choice when buying milk.

Read more...
 

DNA from GM plants found in milk and animal tissue - and in young goats fed on milk

E-mail Print PDF

Comment by TraceConsult: It was only in 2004 when Greenpeace activists thought they had detected scientific evidence that plant DNA – and their main focus was, of course, on transgenic plant DNA – had found its way into cow’s milk. Well, it turned out there had been some contamination and the alarm was off again.

But now the Munich based Institute for Independent Impact Assessment in Biotechnology has published findings that traces of GM corn and soy were found in various animal tissues as well as in milk. 

A new reason for food and retail industry strategists to re-think potential health risks emanating from GMO-fed animal products. After all, transgenic DNA from goat’s milk was also found in goatlings fed with this milk!


Read more...
 

U.S. Federal Court blocks planting of GM sugar beets pending assessment

E-mail Print PDF

Comment by TraceConsult™: Proper assessment? - Environmental impact study (EIS)? - This has got to be terminology that is relatively new to the market leader in glyphosate-resistant GM crops – at least coming from the company’s own home turf.

The gist of a U.S. Federal Court’s decision on August 13 blocking Roundup Ready sugar beets is of a kind the USDA should have thought of itself a decade and a half ago when it first “assessed”, and subsequently approved, Roundup Ready crops such as soybeans and corn. No EIS was required at the time – and the consequence is what American farmers have to struggle with today: A widespread resistance of the leading weeds in North and South America against Roundup, the herbicide considered a silver bullet and Monsanto’s gift to agriculture for so many years. We last reported on this only recently when Monsanto’s local paper, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, ran the headline Roundup’s Potency Slips, Foils Farmers.

Read more...
 

Roundup's potency declines and foils U.S. farmers

E-mail Print PDF

Comment by TraceConsult: So American farmers have come to realize that Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, is “a serious, serious problem”. And a Monsanto spokesman recognizes publicly that his company could have provided some more “education” to the agricultural industry in the early Roundup years 15 years ago. To top this all off, a Midwest farm bureau official tries to explain it all away by pointing out the temptation emanating from the herbicide’s ease of application that “lulled” farmers “into complacency”.

For a full decade and a half, everyone in the U.S. involved in agriculture, starting from the farmers themselves, including big agri-business and even the agricultural attachés in U.S. Embassies worldwide, have declared European consumers as well as politicians and industry officials heeding consumer preferences half-witted for rejecting GMOs. Meanwhile, neither American nor foreign scientists warning USDA officials had a chance of having their concerns heard.

Read more...
 

Campina's LANDLIEBE forces "GMO-free“ causing sales to rise by 15 percent in total

E-mail Print PDF

Comment by TraceConsult: Once again, the world’s largest dairy company has demonstrated that “GMO-free” claims lead to a distinct increase in sales. Since 2008, marking the beginning of products from the basic range of the LANDLIEBE label carrying GMO-free claims, respective sales have risen by 15 percent in total. Only last September we reported an increase of 7.7 percent!

Although FrieslandCampina will keep using their self-designed logo “ohne Gentechnik” (GMO-free), the company is nevertheless a founding member of the Association Food without Genetic Engineering (VLOG) in Berlin. Board member Christoph Zimmer explains that the organization fully understands the continued use of the seal designed by LANDLIEBE: “A corporate group the size of Campina cannot change brands the way others may change their shirts”, says Zimmer. “But we are convinced Campina, too, will start using the ‘Aigner logo’ once it has achieved a certain market penetration.”

Read more...
 

Two-thirds of UK public want their food to be GM-free

E-mail Print PDF

Comment by TraceConsult: It is about time for common sense return to Britain, one might think when reading today’s news – in industry as well as mainstream media – about a brand-new poll on GM food conducted by prestigious GfK. The results indicate clearly that the ongoing efforts of Her Majesty’s Government to feed the public the notion that GMOs are fine to eat are just not working out.

Likewise, the policy decisions of some major retailers, such as Wal-Mart’s British subsidiary Asda – although probably taken with a sigh of relief at the time – now prove to be seriously flawed. Some months ago the company abandoned the Non-GMO ship they once helped create back in the year 2000 as one of two retail pioneers to now join the RTRS platform as full-fledged members with flying colors. Marketed by a strange alliance spanning from Monsanto to the WWF, the RTRS, in effect, supports the planting, processing and distribution of soy products as “sustainable” and even as “responsible”. But that does not exclude soy products derived from genetically modified Roundup Ready soybeans, the cause to many serious problems in countries such as Argentina and the U.S.

Read more...
 

RTRS: New "responsible" soya label meets global rejection

E-mail Print PDF

Comment by TraceConsult: Things have become a bit rough for the RTRS lately. – RTRS? Wasn’t that the soy industry platform based on a wonderful multi-stakeholder process where industry, agricultural producers and Civil Society, i.e. NGOs, are pulling harmoniously together in the same direction? And doesn’t this platform offer assurances that deforestation in the Amazon rain forest will come to a complete stop?

Not so, and many other claims will not materialize either, say now over 200 NGOs from several continents in an open letter published yesterday. For details, see below the press statement by Washington-based Food & Water Watch.

Read more...
 

Brazilian farmers complain that Monsanto restricts access to conventional soybean seeds

E-mail Print PDF

Comment by TraceConsult: Was José Hermeto Hoffmann a clairvoyant or merely the Secretary of Agriculture in the Government of Rio Grande do Sul ten years ago, Brazil’s southernmost state and at the time the only target of illegal smuggling of GM seeds from Argentina?

During his tenure in the late 90s until 2002 he gave quite a few interviews such as this one in his Porto Alegre office where he correctly predicted what farmers based two and a half thousand kilometers further north are experiencing now, ten years later:

A severe dependency on the whims of seed giant Monsanto when procuring conventional soybean seeds, extortionist royalties for those planting GM beans and an overall restriction of freedom in their profession as farmers.

Read more...
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Page 1 of 7